L'Apocalisse del PD.
Forse le previsioni maya relative al 2012 si riferivano al Partito Democratico. Partito che si avvia a grandi falcate verso un DISASTRO di proporzioni apocalittiche appunto. Mai la sinistra è stata così nel caos, così distante dalla sua - ipotetica - Constituency (although he always had, especially the post-PCI left a certain vocation to highbrow snobbery, so vacuous, as intolerable). D'Alema and Bersani - amply demonstrating that it is - seems to make policy from Mars, land totally ignorant of the facts. Now it seems that the only glue that will bring part of Italians (hopefully many) to vote for the "disarming" the left alternative is an indispensable rejection of the politics of personal interests of Berlusconi, not a policy proposal - that we continue to be anxiously waiting - instead it does not exist. The idea does not involve politics dl PD, appears confused, contradictory, incomprehensible, far removed light by the moods of the Italians. Say, do something left of accidents, because it seems the aliens, zombies roam the land like Resident Evil. Stubborn beasts, obtuse, lobotomized looking for someone who cuts their head metaphorically to free them from the weight of a non-life. Maybe ... so maybe the PD could be reborn. And 'necessary perhaps once a symbolic death in order to really rise again? I do not know, the left was already too Doppelganger in this decade as far as I'm concerned. Now is the time to insist that we have, of course! But chiaritevi ideas for God's sake! Why else would we risk the collapse and the responsibility to have left Italy to a sad fate ... Berlusconi - As the barbarians with the Roman Empire - is ravaging this country. No Democratic wins, with him, is safe. Even the achievements of morality. Everything can be questioned. The institutional breakdown, and not only that the government is doing the freedom hero needs a brake. A government of this barbarity is to be countered by another person honest, credible, strong, civil, who can help the Italians to the east, to consciously choose to understand "their" property. To help the Italians to become active participants in the policy of his country, instead of puppets - as happens now - in the hands of one political party, through the able steadfast wireless media burattinaio Berlusconi.
A cosa hanno portato finora alleanze improbabili? E' vero, si è addirittura vinto le elezioni talvolta, ma a che prezzo? Sicuramente a discapito della governabilità. Mettendo in piedi governi paralizzati, ostaggio dei propri stessi alleati, prima ancora che dell'opposizione. Cosa c'entrava ad esempio l'onorevole Mastella, tanto per fare un nome, in un governo della sinistra democratica? E' proprio questa la confusione di cui non si ha alcun bisogno. Lo chiedo a D'Alema... che insiste in questo gioco al massacro. E' un interlocutore davvero credibile e soprattutto adeguato Pier Ferdinando Casini? Una eventuale coalizione con il suo partito aiuta davvero la politica della sinistra a trovare la propria identità? It especially helps the left to send to the voters of their intentions? Goes in the direction of the absolute necessity to help clarify the ideas of a people disoriented? If today, it is true, Berlusconi in Italian politics is the problem, the first duty of those who believe in democracy and freedom is ganging up against this apparent "anomaly" of the system without ifs or buts! Then you can really compare on the real problems of the country, on the right policies to restart the motor in all senses of Italy. This is the point! Mess with its policy of ad hoc alliances, proves not to understand this need. Shows that its inadequacy in general, but also its fundamental uselessness specific function of what should be the aspiration of a large left-wing party.
D'Alema made by. You are an old politician! Bersani you're on the same street. We need change. We need to hear that you are willing to take care of what matters, that you really want to stand out from the people of Berlusconi. And what are you going to believe it really. Why believe this is the first step to convince. And to convince you must demonstrate honesty, clarity, and above all convey to voters that it acts only to save the country, not for self-political game, in which count the seats, personal power and internal alliances and currents of this or that. And 'now that they all begin to do the job for which we pay them handsomely. The one part that does not mean the laws ad personam and the distortion of the institutional balance profess "berluscones" and the other does not replace the risk of "dismissal" on grounds of manifest failure.
0 comments:
Post a Comment