Articolo de La Sentinella del Canavese: 'Referendum? Sciocchezze'. Il Movimento Progetto Piemonte contro i secessionisti
Fonte: La Sentinella del Canavese http://lasentinella.gelocal.it
VALLE ORCO. Spostare i confini tra Valle d'Aosta e Piemonte non risolve i problemi, ma semplicemente li sposta. Se Ceresole e Locana entrassero nella Vallée, vi sarebbero nuovi Comuni confinanti, definiti di "seconda fascia", che vivrebbero i medesimi hardships and the same would happen in areas where there are similar claims.
The solution, however, is to ask that the Piedmont to become an autonomous region. The Movement supports the Piedmont Project, a young political formation that has addressed an open letter to Renzo and John Bruno Mattiet, mayors of Ceresole Royal Locana, expressing great concern about their adherence to the latest action promoted by the municipalities bordering the provinces and the autonomous regions and Switzerland.
Founded in Casale Monferrato, 24 June 2009, the MPP has as its aim the attainment of special status for the Piemonte and so far this has been especially nell'alessandrino in Vercelli, and in the area Cusio Ossola. At last year's municipal occurred in several municipalities, including Parella, with lists in which the candidate was also the chairman, Massimo Iaretti.
himself who signed the letter sent to the first two citizens of the Orco Valley in recent weeks had stated that it supported the protest launched by the Association. Com.Conf, that faced with the cancellation of subsidies for the municipalities bordering urged its members to initiate the process for the referendum in batches of ten each month, Piedmont, Lombardy and Veneto. Both mayors had in fact indicated their willingness to do the same too, immediately causing local irritation of the Northern League, which, some years ago, had been refused themselves by their proposal to hold a referendum for annexation to the Valle d'Aosta.
also angry reactions by the mayors of Noasca, Pier Sergio Cucciatti, but that it had called the referendum, and that of Carema, where citizens voted to become a large majority of Aosta Valley, which has criticized the association to use instrumental to a serious issue as a referendum. Now, another voice joins the chorus. That, precisely, the MPP. "It's not moving the dividing line between the Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta which solves the problem - in fact, says its president -. Unfortunately, it will be resolved even in the Rome office, saw the cut function Fund solidarietà per le aree disagiate e depresse. La risposta passa attraverso un confronto aperto e leale, anche aspro se necessario, ma sempre civile e costruttivo, con le istituzioni piemontesi, Regione e Province interessate, affinché le soluzioni possano essere trovate dal territorio e sul territorio e non attendendo la carità romana, coinvolgendo non solo il mondo della politica ma anche gli operatori economici e le realtà sociali che vi lavorano e vivono. Sarebbe un primo passo verso lo statuto speciale del quale il Piemonte ha tutti i requisiti per potersene fregiare». (o.d.p.)
Friday, January 7, 2011
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Milena Velba Motorcycle Club
Ceresole e Locana in Valle d'Aosta: contrarietà dal Movimento Progetto Piemonte
di Marco Campagnolo
Fonte: http://www.localport.it/eventi/notizie/notizie_espansa.asp?N=69680
The idea of \u200b\u200bsome municipalities High Canavesani to seek annexation to the Valle d'Aosta do not like the "Movement Project Piemonte Casale Monferrato, an association founded two years ago to ensure that even the Piedmont Region will become a special statute. According
Iaretto Massimo, president of the Movement, the initiative of the mayors of Ceresole Royal Locana not convincing, because, he points out in an open letter addressed to the first two citizens Canavese, "To make a marriage should be two and statements by the President of the Aosta Valley are exactly in the opposite direction to that desired. "
also "accepted and conceded that Royal Ceresole Locana become common in the Autonomous Region of Valle d'Aosta - Iaretto continues in the letter addressed to Mayor John Mattiet Ceresole and his colleague Renzo Matteit Locana - the problem of the common border would not be resolved, but if anything only moved, because it would be the common so-called "second tier", bordering with you today, to be in a position to continue your current complaints. "
For Movement Project Piedmont would not be moving the dividing line between the Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta, that can lead to some results: "The answer, in our view, through an open and fair, too harsh if necessary, but always civil and constructive, with the institutions of Piedmont, from the Region and the provinces concerned, so that solutions can be found from the territory and the territory and not waiting for the Roman charity, involving not only the world of politics but also economic operators and social realities that we work and live. "
ultimate aim would be to get to a special statute for the border region of Piedmont, that the Movement would have all the requirements for potersene boast. "How Movement Piedmont Project - Iaretti ends the letter addressed to the two mayors - we are available to meet you, if you consider it appropriate, and to forge a comparison peaceful and constructive ideas. "
di Marco Campagnolo
Fonte: http://www.localport.it/eventi/notizie/notizie_espansa.asp?N=69680
The idea of \u200b\u200bsome municipalities High Canavesani to seek annexation to the Valle d'Aosta do not like the "Movement Project Piemonte Casale Monferrato, an association founded two years ago to ensure that even the Piedmont Region will become a special statute. According
Iaretto Massimo, president of the Movement, the initiative of the mayors of Ceresole Royal Locana not convincing, because, he points out in an open letter addressed to the first two citizens Canavese, "To make a marriage should be two and statements by the President of the Aosta Valley are exactly in the opposite direction to that desired. "
also "accepted and conceded that Royal Ceresole Locana become common in the Autonomous Region of Valle d'Aosta - Iaretto continues in the letter addressed to Mayor John Mattiet Ceresole and his colleague Renzo Matteit Locana - the problem of the common border would not be resolved, but if anything only moved, because it would be the common so-called "second tier", bordering with you today, to be in a position to continue your current complaints. "
For Movement Project Piedmont would not be moving the dividing line between the Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta, that can lead to some results: "The answer, in our view, through an open and fair, too harsh if necessary, but always civil and constructive, with the institutions of Piedmont, from the Region and the provinces concerned, so that solutions can be found from the territory and the territory and not waiting for the Roman charity, involving not only the world of politics but also economic operators and social realities that we work and live. "
ultimate aim would be to get to a special statute for the border region of Piedmont, that the Movement would have all the requirements for potersene boast. "How Movement Piedmont Project - Iaretti ends the letter addressed to the two mayors - we are available to meet you, if you consider it appropriate, and to forge a comparison peaceful and constructive ideas. "
Sunday, January 2, 2011
Denise Milani & Brazilian
MPP interviene sull'iniziativa di Ceresole Reale e Locana di passare alla regione Valle d''Aosta
Egr.Sig. John
Mattiet
Mayor of
10080 - Ceresole Reale (TO)
Residence Hall
Egr.Sig. Renzo
Mattiet
Mayor of
10080 - Locana (TO)
Residence Hall
RE: referendum initiative to change Region municipality Ceresole Royal Locana - Open Letter
Dear Mr. Mayor,
learned from news press the intention of the Municipality of Real Ceresole and Locana to start the process of the referendum, in the terms and conditions provided for by law, for the passage of the respective Towns from Piedmont to the Aosta Valley, in the initiative promoted by the Association. Comi.Conf. - Association of adjoining municipalities that raised within the Movement Project Piedmont considerable concern, especially in the aspect of practical relapse.
Before considering the merits of the statement I would like to clarify what the Movement Piedmont Project. The Piedmont Project
Movement is a political movement open, secular and nonsectarian, founded on the initiative of a group of citizens of Piedmont in Casale Monferrato, the ancient capital of Monferrato, June 24, 2009, the feast of the patron saint of Turin.
Its primary objective is to achieve Special Statute for the Piedmont along the lines of those already existing under the Constitution which is the fundamental point of reference of the movement, along with the values \u200b\u200bof freedom and autonomy in the Charter of Chivasso.
Without this essential premise and back to the main claim I want to emphasize that the initiative - undertaken in consultation and in coordination with the Ass. Comi.Conf. - Basically unconvincing, because - if it was that the referendum process to be successful - to make a marriage should be two and the statements of the President of the Aosta Valley are exactly in the opposite direction from that auspicato.
Un secondo aspetto, poi, è che – sempre ammesso e non concesso che Ceresole Reale e Locana diventino comuni della Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta – il problema dei comuni confinanti non verrebbe risolto, ma caso mai soltanto spostato, perché sarebbero i comuni cosiddetti di “seconda fascia”, oggi con voi confinanti, ad essere nella condizione di portare avanti le Vostre attuali recriminazioni.
In poche parole: non è spostando la linea di demarcazione tra il Piemonte e la Valle d’Aosta (lo stesso discorso potrebbe valere per la Lombardia ed il Veneto con il Trentino Alto Adige ed il Friuli Venezia Giulia) che si risolve un problema.
E, purtroppo, non lo si risolverà neanche in sede romana, visto il nettissimo taglio operato al Fondo di solidarietà per le aree disagiate e depresse.
La risposta, a nostro avviso, passa attraverso un confronto aperto e leale, anche aspro se necessario, ma sempre civile e costruttivo, con le Istituzioni piemontesi, a partire dalla Regione e dalle Province interessate, affinché le soluzioni possano essere trovate dal territorio e sul territorio e non attendendo la carità romana, coinvolgendo non solo il mondo della politica ma anche gli operatori economici e le realtà sociali che vi lavorano e vivono.
Questa sarebbe una affermazione di reale autonomia del territorio e dal territorio piemontese e anche, perché no, un primo passo, che partirebbe proprio dalla montagna Piedmont in the direction of the special statute, which the Piedmont region of the border, has all the requirements for potersene boast. How
Movement Project Piedmont are willing to meet you, if you consider it appropriate, and to forge a peaceful and constructive exchange of ideas.
Sincerely.
Casale Monferrato, January 2, 2011 THE PRESIDENT
Movement Project Piedmont
Massimo Iaretti
Egr.Sig. John
Mattiet
Mayor of
10080 - Ceresole Reale (TO)
Residence Hall
Egr.Sig. Renzo
Mattiet
Mayor of
10080 - Locana (TO)
Residence Hall
RE: referendum initiative to change Region municipality Ceresole Royal Locana - Open Letter
Dear Mr. Mayor,
learned from news press the intention of the Municipality of Real Ceresole and Locana to start the process of the referendum, in the terms and conditions provided for by law, for the passage of the respective Towns from Piedmont to the Aosta Valley, in the initiative promoted by the Association. Comi.Conf. - Association of adjoining municipalities that raised within the Movement Project Piedmont considerable concern, especially in the aspect of practical relapse.
Before considering the merits of the statement I would like to clarify what the Movement Piedmont Project. The Piedmont Project
Movement is a political movement open, secular and nonsectarian, founded on the initiative of a group of citizens of Piedmont in Casale Monferrato, the ancient capital of Monferrato, June 24, 2009, the feast of the patron saint of Turin.
Its primary objective is to achieve Special Statute for the Piedmont along the lines of those already existing under the Constitution which is the fundamental point of reference of the movement, along with the values \u200b\u200bof freedom and autonomy in the Charter of Chivasso.
Without this essential premise and back to the main claim I want to emphasize that the initiative - undertaken in consultation and in coordination with the Ass. Comi.Conf. - Basically unconvincing, because - if it was that the referendum process to be successful - to make a marriage should be two and the statements of the President of the Aosta Valley are exactly in the opposite direction from that auspicato.
Un secondo aspetto, poi, è che – sempre ammesso e non concesso che Ceresole Reale e Locana diventino comuni della Regione Autonoma Valle d’Aosta – il problema dei comuni confinanti non verrebbe risolto, ma caso mai soltanto spostato, perché sarebbero i comuni cosiddetti di “seconda fascia”, oggi con voi confinanti, ad essere nella condizione di portare avanti le Vostre attuali recriminazioni.
In poche parole: non è spostando la linea di demarcazione tra il Piemonte e la Valle d’Aosta (lo stesso discorso potrebbe valere per la Lombardia ed il Veneto con il Trentino Alto Adige ed il Friuli Venezia Giulia) che si risolve un problema.
E, purtroppo, non lo si risolverà neanche in sede romana, visto il nettissimo taglio operato al Fondo di solidarietà per le aree disagiate e depresse.
La risposta, a nostro avviso, passa attraverso un confronto aperto e leale, anche aspro se necessario, ma sempre civile e costruttivo, con le Istituzioni piemontesi, a partire dalla Regione e dalle Province interessate, affinché le soluzioni possano essere trovate dal territorio e sul territorio e non attendendo la carità romana, coinvolgendo non solo il mondo della politica ma anche gli operatori economici e le realtà sociali che vi lavorano e vivono.
Questa sarebbe una affermazione di reale autonomia del territorio e dal territorio piemontese e anche, perché no, un primo passo, che partirebbe proprio dalla montagna Piedmont in the direction of the special statute, which the Piedmont region of the border, has all the requirements for potersene boast. How
Movement Project Piedmont are willing to meet you, if you consider it appropriate, and to forge a peaceful and constructive exchange of ideas.
Sincerely.
Casale Monferrato, January 2, 2011 THE PRESIDENT
Movement Project Piedmont
Massimo Iaretti
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Wildtree Herbs Rep In Michigan
Felt, Belpietro, but we do or are there?
The newspapers which refer to Mr Felt Belpietro and never miss an opportunity to demonstrate cultural backwardness, immorality, professional and increasingly a real idiot (hidden behind the complacency hyperbolic, typical of those being unintelligent can not see beyond their own vision of things: in short, get there, poor things, there is little to do). We start from the case
Fini. Can a journalist blow a case just "rumors"? It is professional to write the piece and then say "now expect other (ie the judges) look for evidence?". An anonymous Pugliese was told casually Belpietro (known to be easily accessible by anyone), at a particularly appropriate in the political situation, a 'huge' and Belpietro doing? Search for evidence, any supporting evidence, as would a journalist worthy of this name? Not at all. Share magnitude as it is: Fini would be concocting a fake bomb to himself and then put the blame on Berlusconi. It is certain that Belpietro false attacks they will be enough to see the trouble that is passing her ex-boss basis in this regard. But his experience on does not, journalistically, this type of behavior. Belpietro, and Felt, should understand once and for all who are not at the bar (of course the number of newspaper readers would be the reference of the patrons of a bar in the suburbs if they did not offer the limelight from the television press releases), that we are not to do 'du' chatter between noiartri. Journalism is (was, because now in Italy ...) a serious work, the journalist has a responsibility, its subject is (or should be) the facts . Then there will be those who have the task of expressing opinions about these facts. But the facts (and by this means events that have objective evidence) are essential for this job. Otherwise you are writers, storytellers, comedians, fantasists, opinion bar, Minzolini, Vespa, but not journalists. The containers of its "invention" in this case could not be the newspapers, the newspapers (or news), but other media incornicino their utterances precisely as a story, novel, joke, joke simple, entertainment. And to think that these so-called professionals pen, they are guaranteed the same hardcore sticking his head down and Spatuzza Ciancimino (not an anonymous Puglia that has heard someone say something about someone else), when they could just go across half of the Premier (of course). "Just trust the word of repentance Spatuzza like clockwork," screaming like madmen, "Just give credit to the psychotic delusions of Ciancimino, tear their hair. "We need evidence, otherwise the words are hot air," they say. Absolutely, in fact, "Verba Volant", but "scripta manent" and you, the print reckless, superficial morality - your yes to watch or rather bribed - champions of injustice, you just "write." Do not be surprised if you then click the complaints do not make the victims because the perpetrators are, do not shout incoherently scandal when someone decides to give you back tit for tat, you are, if not daily, at least a semblance of men!
also decide to dismiss the case, "Elton John" , which is expected, observers willing to comparison (normal to journalists), intelligent and in tune with the evident needs of this new century, with the inevitable change of costume (which change much despite the die-hard reactionaries and ubiquitous) call important considerations, an open confrontation (because half of us are lives and personalities - as children - that are being built just across the relations) with a vulgarity as to define a man, "Mama," a show of superficiality worthy of the worst troglodytes, has dell'icredibile really. A homosexual is not a "uoma" dear Belpietro and Felt, or a "woman" in the same way as each of you would not be for some an "idiot" (but really an idiot!). A homosexual is a man or woman, without any confusion. So may be either a father or a mother. And in this case, both parents can be a good father or bad fathers. Obviously the relationship with the child, each will provide their own sensibility and - hopefully - will do their best to contribute to a peaceful development of the personality and character of the child. But in this case you should still think its the best way to prepare for possible openings (we hope) in future this way. The issue of the womb for rent for example, is another issue that should certainly be debated. The age of neopapà (sixty-five) is certainly a problem - at least in my opinion. In fact, the English law that allows adoption by same-sex couples the fixed limit age forty-five years. On the other hand no one raised an ethical case for example when in Italy (in a conventional marriage) was Mike Bongiorno became the father of the same age, for example by Elton John. In these cases, obviously no one would dream of challenging personal freedoms. Can you imagine a law that imposes a couple of non-proliferation after a certain age? Something similar to the taxation laws of both Chinese-style condemned by the West, but for heaven's sake! So the real question is how to reconcile the inconsistency and diversity that is created - in terms of personal freedom - including one who is free to proliferate when and how he likes best (be it an old man, a criminal, a pedophile, a serial killer a stalker), provided that within a couple of traditional and conventional, and those who can not do it (taking into account the fact that a huge number of children in desperate need of a family). Obviously I am simplifying things and I certainly answers on pre-packaged. Just try to reflect on the issue, without trivializing a vulgar neologism ("mother"). I would only point out that on issues of this magnitude we would expect stress and thoughts of thickness, we would expect someone to help us to think, and do not receive the price of one euro, newspapers, exactly what we sentire ovunque, da chiunque.
The newspapers which refer to Mr Felt Belpietro and never miss an opportunity to demonstrate cultural backwardness, immorality, professional and increasingly a real idiot (hidden behind the complacency hyperbolic, typical of those being unintelligent can not see beyond their own vision of things: in short, get there, poor things, there is little to do). We start from the case
Fini. Can a journalist blow a case just "rumors"? It is professional to write the piece and then say "now expect other (ie the judges) look for evidence?". An anonymous Pugliese was told casually Belpietro (known to be easily accessible by anyone), at a particularly appropriate in the political situation, a 'huge' and Belpietro doing? Search for evidence, any supporting evidence, as would a journalist worthy of this name? Not at all. Share magnitude as it is: Fini would be concocting a fake bomb to himself and then put the blame on Berlusconi. It is certain that Belpietro false attacks they will be enough to see the trouble that is passing her ex-boss basis in this regard. But his experience on does not, journalistically, this type of behavior. Belpietro, and Felt, should understand once and for all who are not at the bar (of course the number of newspaper readers would be the reference of the patrons of a bar in the suburbs if they did not offer the limelight from the television press releases), that we are not to do 'du' chatter between noiartri. Journalism is (was, because now in Italy ...) a serious work, the journalist has a responsibility, its subject is (or should be) the facts . Then there will be those who have the task of expressing opinions about these facts. But the facts (and by this means events that have objective evidence) are essential for this job. Otherwise you are writers, storytellers, comedians, fantasists, opinion bar, Minzolini, Vespa, but not journalists. The containers of its "invention" in this case could not be the newspapers, the newspapers (or news), but other media incornicino their utterances precisely as a story, novel, joke, joke simple, entertainment. And to think that these so-called professionals pen, they are guaranteed the same hardcore sticking his head down and Spatuzza Ciancimino (not an anonymous Puglia that has heard someone say something about someone else), when they could just go across half of the Premier (of course). "Just trust the word of repentance Spatuzza like clockwork," screaming like madmen, "Just give credit to the psychotic delusions of Ciancimino, tear their hair. "We need evidence, otherwise the words are hot air," they say. Absolutely, in fact, "Verba Volant", but "scripta manent" and you, the print reckless, superficial morality - your yes to watch or rather bribed - champions of injustice, you just "write." Do not be surprised if you then click the complaints do not make the victims because the perpetrators are, do not shout incoherently scandal when someone decides to give you back tit for tat, you are, if not daily, at least a semblance of men!
also decide to dismiss the case, "Elton John" , which is expected, observers willing to comparison (normal to journalists), intelligent and in tune with the evident needs of this new century, with the inevitable change of costume (which change much despite the die-hard reactionaries and ubiquitous) call important considerations, an open confrontation (because half of us are lives and personalities - as children - that are being built just across the relations) with a vulgarity as to define a man, "Mama," a show of superficiality worthy of the worst troglodytes, has dell'icredibile really. A homosexual is not a "uoma" dear Belpietro and Felt, or a "woman" in the same way as each of you would not be for some an "idiot" (but really an idiot!). A homosexual is a man or woman, without any confusion. So may be either a father or a mother. And in this case, both parents can be a good father or bad fathers. Obviously the relationship with the child, each will provide their own sensibility and - hopefully - will do their best to contribute to a peaceful development of the personality and character of the child. But in this case you should still think its the best way to prepare for possible openings (we hope) in future this way. The issue of the womb for rent for example, is another issue that should certainly be debated. The age of neopapà (sixty-five) is certainly a problem - at least in my opinion. In fact, the English law that allows adoption by same-sex couples the fixed limit age forty-five years. On the other hand no one raised an ethical case for example when in Italy (in a conventional marriage) was Mike Bongiorno became the father of the same age, for example by Elton John. In these cases, obviously no one would dream of challenging personal freedoms. Can you imagine a law that imposes a couple of non-proliferation after a certain age? Something similar to the taxation laws of both Chinese-style condemned by the West, but for heaven's sake! So the real question is how to reconcile the inconsistency and diversity that is created - in terms of personal freedom - including one who is free to proliferate when and how he likes best (be it an old man, a criminal, a pedophile, a serial killer a stalker), provided that within a couple of traditional and conventional, and those who can not do it (taking into account the fact that a huge number of children in desperate need of a family). Obviously I am simplifying things and I certainly answers on pre-packaged. Just try to reflect on the issue, without trivializing a vulgar neologism ("mother"). I would only point out that on issues of this magnitude we would expect stress and thoughts of thickness, we would expect someone to help us to think, and do not receive the price of one euro, newspapers, exactly what we sentire ovunque, da chiunque.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)