Io, personalmente, non vado matto per la politica americana, né quando si tratta del partito democratico né, a maggior ragione, quando si tratta del terribile partito repubblicano, specie di quello segnato per troppo tempo dal tragico regime dei Bush. Però la coerenza dimostrata dal presidente Obama e la sua caparbietà quando si tratta di dare priorità alle battaglie etiche di civiltà, a rischio anche della propria popolarità (in discesa rapida purtroppo), è innegabile.
What is the difference in this effect with the Italian political proclamations, of demagoguery, of "slogans" and shouted pre-made for the most gullible dupe, just like advertising, for which no matter how true or false, to which matter only flatter, persuade, acquired and for which you are nothing but a number, a customer stupid enough to entertain a lot, tempted to sell. Yet the policy should be something else, or not?
What's the difference then with our Berlusconi, my god!
A New York have plans for a mosque two blocks from the hole left by the Twin Towers. The land is private and America respects more than any What other private property. Moreover, America respects the freedom of worship. America respects individual freedoms in general and is proclaimed the undisputed cradle of civil rights (though with a lot of contradictions, one can actually say that it really is).
The protests of the Jewish community have not had to wait of course (and I can not express what this insistence of a great people in other ways, to prove, at crucial moments, so small, it irritates me) and could not miss even the protests of local citizens, those who live over there and have seen the view from your window disappear before his eyes in an instant, those who had friends trapped in the inferno Smoke and flames, those who know qulcuno, who is good friends with someone whose brother, who is a firefighter, was there that day, digging with bare hands. But sacred feelings of awkwardness aside, what can only say "civil" and "constitution" in a case like this? Which of course the Muslim community has every right to build this holy mosque. No acceptable solution is no solution that does not seem illiberal censorship, demagogic, intolerant. Some will say that the choice of location by the Muslim community is challenging (in fact it might seem), even outrageous. But why then, to think of it? The "Islam" can not and should not be likened to "Islamic terrorism". Of course! Yet sometimes some Mosques have proved hideouts of terrorists. Maybe. How the other hand, some churches have proved to be the hideouts of pedophiles, but this certainly can not blame the Catholic faith, nor anyone would dare to protest or prevent the construction of a church.
However it will certainly competent authorities must ensure and verify (and indeed have a constitutional right), after its completion, that the purpose of this building are actually and exclusively the religion, faith and prayer . But of course you can not do it in advance with a real process of plans.
But why say this?
Why this is, strictly speaking, not supposed to be a problem with the President of the United States of America. This is a problem with the mayor of New York and President Obama, with indisputable political expediency, he could stay out. Did not have to expose himself, but above all it was not advisable from the standpoint of the "popularity" (including for example our lives and of which Berlusconi is continually fills her mouth ... and when he does not think, think about their bodies media to make him a servile service). But Obama has shown how. She cried in public, with power and responsibility civile, che costoro hanno il diritto di costruirla questa benedetta Moschea. Era così ovvio che fosse così, che forse non era necessario intervenire. Eppure proprio il fatto che invece ci fosse qualcuno (tantissimi a dire la verità), anche tra i politici (di qualsiasi parte politica siano proprio costoro dovrebbero, si suppone, essere tutti sempre e comunque garanti del rispetto dei diritti sanciti dalla Costituzione – so che a molti Italiani questo concetto possa far sorridere, se non ridere, grazie alla nostra classe dirigente), a pensarla in modo così evidentemente illiberale, antidemocratico e incostituzionale, ha spinto Obama nella sua qualità di americano, cittadino e Presidente a prendere posizione. Una scelta che si è revealed a severe blow to his popularity. He intentionally offered his side (already so weakened by the economic crisis) to his enemies, who have been raging at the sound of slogans, fanning fear and fomenting the largest U.S. post September 11.
Yet I think that Obama, for doing that, peaceful sleep. And every day, looking into her daughters eyes, you will probably feel a bit 'more involved than "humanity" that some - very few - are trying to build for the future of this world, in contrast to the "bestiality" which is rather built here, especially in recent years. Here the political
over their children swear recklessly false. Here you go to hell almost proudly. Here, corruption, dishonesty and personal advantage are on the agenda and absolutely horizontal. Here, the privileged systematically evade taxes (actors, singers, sports champions, all instigated by a malpractice that has become our custom, if you do you're almost a loser, not a honest!). Here overpaid politicians and insatiable, who already pay taxes should not even, believe it is sacrosanct round further with bribes, or for a fee the house (overlooking the Colosseum), or taking money from the bank heading for their foraging societies, or simply accepting innocent massages and treatments, when most of us, but that does nothing but pay, pay, pay, does not even make ends meet.
But beyond all this squalor that surely we deserve, so we have proved unable to react by exercising our right to protest (in Rome Mayor Alemanno wants to tax that too!) Or at least as we seem unable to read critical (but only to read) the world around us, what we can teach this attempt, if not real political suicide, at least to inappropriate policy, President of the United States of America? That the politician should feel her as a real mandate.
that he must be better than those che è chiamato a governare e deve dimostrare una forza e una coerenza tali da prendersi anche la responsabilità di decidere per loro, e di costringerli a essere giusti.
Che deve, in una parola, guidarli.
E se ciò alla fine non dovesse essere compreso, se la maggioranza che vota si dimostrerà ostinata e chiusa nella propria reazionaria ottusità, chi se ne frega?
Se sei stato Presidente degli Stati Uniti d’America e hai interpretato il tuo ruolo con coerenza e fedeltà ai tuoi principi, un giorno questo ti sarà riconosciuto dalla Storia. Come puoi sbagliare se farai sempre e solo ciò in cui credi davvero e ciò in cui credi sono i principi sanciti dalla tua Costituzione, la Libertà, l’onesta, il Diritto?
E adesso pensate all’Italia. Pensate a ciò in cui credono Berlusconi e i suoi compari.
0 comments:
Post a Comment