Berlusconi si fa un baffo della Costituzione. L’ha detto esplicitamente. Non c’è Carta Costituzionale, prerogativa del Presidente della Repubblica o del Parlamento che tengano. Sono solo tutti fastidiosi ostacoli. Ammennicoli di cui Lui in Persona può fare tranquillamente a meno. Perché Lui in Persona ha dalla propria parte il popolo sovrano (che però exert its sovereignty, it should be remembered, in the forms and limits of the Constitution, in fact!). Yeah, shame that the top people there they had the blessing even Hitler and Mussolini and looks a bit 'as it turned out. So, according to his reasoning, Berlusconi can legally and legitimately act as Roman Emperor, rather than as prime minister and do what he pleases in the name of "consensus." And with the - logically - inexplicable complicity of its own, sew on the dress total impunity, prevent processes, dodge the numerous scandals that have cast doubt due largely to its morality, to process millions of euros in taxes in the light of the sun (see the case Mondadori) and where unleash their attack dogs, hired directors of newspapers and TV newscasts (one, on behalf of Felt, faithful servant, the director of a newspaper owned by the family, does not flinch even when it comes to publicly discredit the very private affairs in relation to ex-wife of his master, to him in person, entering into the merits of a controversy of which not only should not fool anyone, but of which the Lord - so to speak - Felt would not have any title to speak, to moralize or judge, much less). Newspapers and news directors, said, with their highly skilled in narcotize drugs (read crap) media that the sovereign people, scattering to the four winds smoky chatter and screaming chaotically over any dissenting voice, nipped in the bud. In fact, they rant about anything, and magnify trifles pinzillacchere different, making sure even the slightest touch, or vice versa, however, to diminish, the various trifles - so to speak - that concern him in person. Felt has the courage to ask how he created his heritage Mrs. Tulliani, when he never asked the same legitimate question to him in person, which, inter alia, mail it to him who in the past, however you never responded . A man, he himself, who from nothing has created a financial empire, which has robbed villas naive girls, which has always bent the law to its comfortable receiving the favors from friends are well integrated (see Craxi), under whose roof they lived mobsters and murderers, but to which the felt can not find anything to ask. To him in person. This would be enough to emphasize the bias of this so-called journalist (ahahaha!), pitifully and shamefully subservient to the needs of the owner.
regard the exiled and rejected Gianfranco Fini then - beyond the particular ethical issues that concern him and to be verified - would exist in Italy, as in any democracy worthy of the name, the so-called "no mandate", but none of our Members, among them who first should be the guarantors of the rules these days seem to remember. What is this prohibition? In a nutshell elected representative has a duty to always act according to conscience (not by that of the party who did elect to start with) and without feeling in any way influenced in their choice by a hypothetical popular mandate. Or if he was elected to the North, for example, should, once elected, however, act in the interest of all Italians and not just one part of the country, to the detriment of the rest (perhaps we should remember the League, from time to time) . In short, a deputy or a senator has, at any time, the right not to be approved, if they consider necessario. Ed è anche per questo che il ricorso sistematico del governo Berlusconi alla fiducia ha, a rigore, il sapore se non dell’anticostituzionalità vera e propria, almeno di uno schiaffo moralmente inaccettabile alle prerogative del Parlamento, al sacrosanto diritto/dovere di ogni deputato di discutere i provvedimenti, di sollevare dubbi, qualora ne avesse. Dubbi che dovrebbero potersi sollevare non solo da parte dell’Opposizione, ma anche all’interno di uno stesso schieramento – in democrazia – senza essere considerati per questo “traditori” del popolo o di Lui in Persona. Piuttosto ci sarebbe da chiedersi come mai, molti nel PDL, abbiano invece da tempo rinunciato a questo sacrosanto diritto. Come ever, most uncritically follows the Lord in this drift demagogic and populist, without worrying about the consequences for our increasingly battered democracy hostage to this crazy fool of him in person, whose utterances should shudder to anyone who cares about this country. But no! The are all behind. Why? They are all so really at risk of "dossieraggio" from having to do to force the best of a bad game? Could it really be the only explanation, my god! Less than considering all so short-sighted, politically and morally obtuse, so hold on to your seats, but also widely idiots to do what they do simply out of pure greed or even real conviction. Sure to look good in my face (I think Brunetta, Calderoli, Cota, Alfano, Cicchitto, Bondi and many others) this second hypothesis is quite plausible.
But in all this there is a truth. Popular sovereignty. The right of the people to hear (in the manner and limits of the Constitution) your own voice. There is, thank God, that right to vote, so called by him in person because in the end (and not entirely wrongly) considers all of us retired balls. We want to give it one more time right? instead it could be an opportunity to recover a minimum of dignity sacrosanct. Vogliamoci a bit 'more than all good, shit, e mandiamo a casa il Dittatore e la sua cricca. Mandiamo a casa coloro che hanno ritenuto di poter disporre a piacimento della nostra terra, coloro che ritengono di poter disporre anche di tutti noi. E’ ora di dire basta!
0 comments:
Post a Comment